What deserves attention?
Priority Poker
Let people score independently, reveal the spread, and discuss why Sales, Product, and Engineering see the same bet differently.
See inputs, outputs, and exampleProduct planning / 01
A plan people can inspect before they depend on it.
From team judgment to a plan you can explain.
Compare priorities, test what fits, find what could move, and give every stakeholder the right version of the story—all from the same connected product context.
A connected product planning loop from priorities through capacity and stakeholder communication
The planning job
Specky keeps each decision distinct. First compare what matters. Then test what fits. Then inspect risk. Only after that do you communicate the plan.
“What can we responsibly commit to next?”
Input can be a metric question, a customer complaint, a pasted note, or a pattern you cannot explain yet.
An explainable plan
Compare the options without anchoring the room.
Test the ranked work against real capacity.
Check prerequisites and changed assumptions.
Tell each audience what it needs to know.
Each planning tool is a direct destination in the Specky sidebar, with one purpose, a concrete output, and a complete how-to.
What deserves attention?
Let people score independently, reveal the spread, and discuss why Sales, Product, and Engineering see the same bet differently.
See inputs, outputs, and exampleWhat can actually fit?
State points per week, the horizon, and the candidate work. See what fits and what crosses the line before the scenario becomes a promise.
See inputs, outputs, and exampleWhat could move the date?
Connect prerequisites and surface blocked, overdue, overrun, or stale work as prompts for a human check-in—not automatic verdicts.
See inputs, outputs, and exampleWhere is risk concentrated?
Compare objectives, roadmap progress, risks, and real customer signals across products in the same organization.
See inputs, outputs, and exampleWhat does this audience need?
Create a clear Now, Next, Later story from the same source items, without cloning the roadmap or inventing precision.
See inputs, outputs, and exampleNot because one formula rejected it, but because the connected decisions expose what the team must resolve first.
What the team puts in
What Specky helps them see
Sales scores export 5; Engineering scores it 2 because permissions are unresolved. Capacity fits five smaller bets but not all eight. The dependency is blocked and stale. The stakeholder roadmap becomes:
Now
Onboarding reliability
Next
Permissions model
Later
Enterprise export
The team leaves with a sequence, a reason, and the uncertainty attached—not a date everyone knows is fiction.
No. Specky helps the team decide and explain what should happen; Jira, Linear, and GitHub remain the systems that track delivery. Approved work can move into those tools with its product context attached.
No. Scores, distributions, capacity assumptions, and drift rules make the reasoning visible. The team still owns the decision, and a drift signal should be confirmed with the owner before a commitment changes.
No. They store an audience, narrative, horizon, and references to existing planning items. The message changes; the underlying work stays in one place.
Specky shows the gap instead of quietly inventing precision. Add the best current estimate, label the uncertainty, and update the scenario when the team learns more.
Start with one real decision. Specky will help your team compare it, fit it, protect it, and explain it without losing the evidence behind it.